July 2008


I started as a financial advisor in 1985. Those of you managing your finances back then know that the last big recession ended in late 1982 or early 1983.

If you had to pick a time to be buying stocks, you could not do much better than 1983 to 1986. The return on stocks from 1973 to 1982 had been zero. Exhausted investors had pretty much given up on stocks and had switched their capital to things like gold, stamp collections and farmland. Oil was a big winner back then, along with precious stones and other “hard” assets.

Stocks, long neglected, rallied over 50 per cent in 1983 and then kept going, buoyed by stronger earnings that came on heels of the economy shaking off the shackles of an intense recession. Oil prices were coming down and interest rates were finally easing in the face of tamed inflation.

It would be a couple years before my first education in bear markets would show up. Eventually, Black Monday in October of 1987 stopped the party for a while. A precipitous 25-per-cent one-day drop caught the world’s attention and reminded us all that stocks went up most of the time, but not all of the time.

Bear markets all feel about the same. In retrospect they are short-lived, but when you go through one, it feels like it lasts forever. A friend of mine once said it was like being on a water wheel. While most of the time the wheel is out in the open air, the time under water always seems to last longer. You have to hold your breath.

We are in some remarkable times right now. The weakness in the U.S. housing market has uncovered a house of cards built on consumer credit and subprime mortgages. Today, one in every 500 homes in the U.S. is being foreclosed. The financial institutions that extended credit assuming that they could get their money back by repossessing real estate did not count on a 25-per-cent drop in house prices. This precipitous drop has eliminated the collateral on a lot of debt secured to real estate.

Today, “safe as houses” does not seem to hold true. The past year’s 20-per-cent decline in the world stock market index is significant, but many investors have been stunned by even greater drops in what most thought were “safe” investments. A year ago Bank of Montreal shares were $71; today, they trade around $40. Investors who bought CIBC shares have suffered even more, giving up 50 per cent of their value in the last 12 months. Berkshire Hathaway, representing the investment wealth and wisdom of Warren Buffet, has also declined about 20%.

It is our nature to extend current experience into the future. The various stock markets will recover, but it sure doesn’t feel that way each time you look at your statement. While I cannot tell you when the recovery will arrive, I can tell you it will.

There is a big difference between temporary declines and permanent damage. Temporary declines happen to broadly diversified portfolios. Permanent damage can happen when your portfolio is concentrated. There are a few pitfalls, my hard-won past experience tells me, to avoid while we wait for the broad markets to bounce back.

The first pitfall is related to our tendency to extend past experience forward. The fact that oil and gold have been remarkable investments over the past few years does not mean they will continue to do well in the future. You should, by all means, have an exposure to oil and gold in your portfolio, but dumping everything you have into what did well last year becomes a bet, not a portfolio. Bets tend to be a win-or-lose proposition. While winning is great, losing a bet is usually too great a risk when it comes to your life savings.

Oil has not always been the big winner. I attended an investor conference in 1996, sponsored by the firm for which I worked at the time. The price of oil was about $20 per barrel and our firm had been recommending shares in a company called Renaissance Energy. Renaissance was a very well-managed Canadian oil company that had traded at $51 a year earlier when the firm began to recommend it. The price at the time of the investor conference was $15.

The presenter was still recommending the purchase of shares and joked that “if you were dyslexic you really haven’t noticed any difference over the last year.” This was funny to almost everyone who did not own any shares.

The presenter, of course, was absolutely correct. Investors should have oil in their portfolio, but past experience told them it was a loser. Those investors wary of oil would be right for a few years to come.

The current market malaise will end one day. Investors who are diversified will recover and many investors who are not diversified will lose their money. Today, a lot of people believe they are being more conservative by putting a lot more their eggs in last year’s winning basket. If you are tempted to join them in the rush to oil and gold, just be sure that you are OK with both sides of the bet.

Alan MacDonald is an investment adviser who helps high-tech entrepreneurs make smart decisions about money. Contact Alan at Alan.Macdonald@RichardsonGMP.com

The good news, for all those who love life, is that every generation has lived longer than the previous generation. This generation of baby boomers will be no different. We will, on average, live longer than any generation that came before.

When the clock struck midnight on Dec. 31, 1899, the average lifespan was less than 50 years. Today, it looks like most of us will live into our 80s. In fact, I happened to be at a speech given by a prominent medical scientist who claimed everyone in the room had a pretty good chance of making it to 100 years old. We are sitting at the doorsteps of so many advances in medical science. Many of the things that used to do us in will simply be cured by the time it’s our time.

The flip side of this ample lifespan is that we have to fund long retirements. It’s no fun being old and broke, so making your money last is a big deal. If you have taken a look at what it takes to produce income from capital over a long period, you know that the three great risks are inflation, outliving your money and losing money.

One of the arguments for stocks in a senior’s portfolio is that you need growth even after you retire. Since inflation takes away half of your money every 20 years, your portfolio will have to double between the age of 60 and 80 just to keep its purchasing power. If you are drawing income from that portfolio at the same time, it usually takes a pretty big return number to make it all work.

As financial planners, we will often encourage a mix of stocks and bonds to reach a higher rate of return.

Let’s say the required rate of return to reach your goal is seven per cent. A return of seven per cent should be fairly easy to achieve with a good balanced portfolio. A portfolio of 50 per cent stocks and 50 per cent bonds will normally do the job.

Markets, however, often do not co-operate with our financial projections. While it is true that you might average seven per cent over a 15-year time frame, you can have pretty wide swings in returns along the way.

The S&P 500 index, an index composed of the 500 largest companies in the U.S., sat at 1,500 at the end of 1999. Today, this same index sits at 1,300. So the eight-year return on this index is about negative 13 per cent. If you care to get more depressed, you can consider the appreciation of the Canadian dollar against these U.S. stocks. A Canadian investor in large U.S. stocks has lost over 40 per cent to currency over the same eight-year time frame.

The investor who, in 1999, bought a portfolio of world-beating U.S. stocks as a retirement strategy, and then took five per cent per year for income, is likely broke today.

They are broke in spite of the fact that large U.S. stocks averaged 11 per cent per year over the last 200 years.

So how do you avoid this potential pitfall of stock market returns disappearing just when you need them the most? We still need growth in our portfolios to defeat inflation, and we still need a portfolio that will last through retirements that can span 30, even 40 years.

The first step is not to rely on long-term assets, like stocks, to satisfy short-term needs such as income. Stocks become reliable over periods of 10 and 20 years. So whatever income you are going to need over the first 10 years of your retirement should not be in stocks.

One strategy is to take the amount of income you need and put it into a ladder of bonds or GICs. A $50,000 per-year income would see you buying 10 bonds that mature at $50,000 per year for the next ten years.

Once this income stream has been protected, you can now invest the balance, or a reasonable portion of your portfolio, for growth. To increase your safety, you might consider adding some growth investments which are not stocks. Pension funds, for years, have used real estate and private equity to get returns that are as high, or higher, than stocks. Private equity and real estate take their dips like any other equity investment, but the timing of the dips will be different from stocks.

The best retirement portfolio is one that is allocated according to time frame. Your short-term income needs in short-term investments like GICs or bonds. Long-term growth allocated to long-term investments like stocks, private equity and real estate.

Alan MacDonald is an investment adviser who helps high-tech entrepreneurs make smart decisions about money. Contact Alan at Alan.Macdonald@RichardsonGMP.com